Given policies POL_2 (priority 90), POL_3 (priority 100), POL_4 (priority 110), POL_1 (priority 120) bound to a VPN HTTP vServer, in which order will policies be evaluated?

Given policies POL_2 (priority 90), POL_3 (priority 100), POL_4 (priority 110), POL_1 (priority 120) bound to a VPN HTTP vServer, in which order will policies be evaluated?

• A. POL_2, POL_3
• B. POL_2
• C. POL_2, POL_3, POL_4, POL_1
• D. POL_2, POL_3, POL_4

Answer: (C)

Policies bound to a VPN HTTP vServer are evaluated in order of their priority values, with smaller numbers checked first. In this case, POL_2 has the lowest priority value (90), followed by POL_3 (100), POL_4 (110), and POL_1 (120). Therefore, the evaluation order is POL_2, POL_3, POL_4, POL_1. If a policy matches, its action is applied and subsequent policies are typically not evaluated for that session. If two policies shared the same priority, the tie would be broken by the binding order.

Policies bound to a VPN HTTP vServer are evaluated in order of their priority values, with smaller numbers checked first. In this case, POL_2 has the lowest priority value (90), followed by POL_3 (100), POL_4 (110), and POL_1 (120). Therefore, the evaluation order is POL_2, POL_3, POL_4, POL_1. If a policy matches, its action is applied and subsequent policies are typically not evaluated for that session. If two policies shared the same priority, the tie would be broken by the binding order.